GRAMMAR OF PHYSICS
———-
Polly kicked one red ball twice at 2 p.m. over the fence for the team.
———-
Polly ………….who intelligence “person”
kicked…………action motion, movement, agility “do”
one…………….quantitatively, how much quantitative “numbers”
red………………which qualitatively “descriptive”
ball……………..what object “it”
twice……………frequency how many recurrences of action
at 2 pm…………when time “at”
over the fence….where location “over”
for the team…….why reason “for”
———-
Communication in grammatical forms expose deeper physical concepts and nature of reality.
———-
For any communicative exposition of words, deeper questions arise as to:
———-
whom, what, when, where, why, how, which, how much, how many etc.
———-
Laws of physics generally govern motion, action in the universe, and specifically explain
———-
all reasoning through with in by for as to from etc. (all pre positioning) of phenomenal character.
———-
Diagramming communications, whether spoken or written, opens a whole frontier of science and art,
———-
nature and culture.
———-
Pay attention to articles and particles in communications, especially those in pre position, opposition,
———-
proposition, etc.
———-
Articulation (a, an and the), and particulation (this, that, these, those, many, some, much etc.)
———-
characterize mathematical principles in grammar of differing scopes to reason.
———-
“a bus rolled down the street, as “opposed” to “the bus rolled down the street.”
———-
“this bus rolled down the street” as qualified, opposed to “many buses rolled down the street.”
———-
Logic, reasoning, mathematics, physics are unlocked, hidden, in expression of the WORD, and
———-
combinations, for definition as to qualification and quantification of the basic questions, possible
———-
and probable, conclusive or inconclusive, inclusive or exclusive, contradictory and/or parallel.
———-
———-
ezracriesdotorg by: Tobias Taoh (tim ishmael) 